RoutineMetric

Clayton Act Section 8 Interlock Screener

Analyze interlocking directorates and officer roles against statutory FTC size and de minimis sales thresholds.

Interlock & Jurisdiction Configuration

Corporation A DetailsComp: 8.00%

Corporation B DetailsComp: 77.27%

Compliance Verdict

PROHIBITED

The interlocking directorate violates Clayton Act Section 8 rules.

FTC Size Limit (2026):$54,402,000
Corporation A Assets:$65,000,000 (Exceeds)
Corporation B Assets:$58,000,000 (Exceeds)

Section 8 Exemptions Audit

Joint Aggregate Size Threshold

Triggered: Both corporations exceed the aggregate size threshold.

Competitive Overlap Check

Triggered: Corporations are horizontal competitors with active competitive sales.

Absolute Sales Exception (< $5,440,200)

Not met: Both corporations' competitive sales are above $5,440,200.

2% Percentage Exception

Not met: Both corporations' competitive sales exceed 2.0% of their total sales (Corporation A: 8.00%, Corporation B: 77.27%).

4% Combined Exception

Not met: One or both corporations' competitive sales exceed 4.0% of total sales.

Board Compliance Memo

CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors / Compliance Committee FROM: Corporate Counsel / Compliance Department DATE: September 9, 2026 SUBJECT: Antitrust Compliance Analysis: Clayton Act Section 8 Interlock Evaluation INTERLOCKED INDIVIDUAL: John Doe PROPOSED ROLE(S): Director EVALUATED YEAR: 2026 Thresholds (2026 FTC Revised) COMPLIANCE VERDICT: PROHIBITED 1. JURISDICTIONAL SIZE TEST (Section 8(a)(1)) - Aggregate Size Threshold: $54,402,000 - Corporation A Capital/Surplus: $65,000,000 (Exceeds: YES) - Corporation B Capital/Surplus: $58,000,000 (Exceeds: YES) - Joint Jurisdictional Triggered: YES (Both Exceed) 2. COMPETITIVE OVERLAP & EXEMPTION TESTS (Section 8(a)(2)) - Corporation A Competitive Sales: $12,000,000 (8.00% of total annual sales: $150,000,000) - Corporation B Competitive Sales: $85,000,000 (77.27% of total annual sales: $110,000,000) - De Minimis Exception Limit: $5,440,200 - Safe Harbors Triggered: * Absolute Dollar Exception (< $5,440,200): NO * 2% Total Sales Exception (< 2%): NO * 4% Each Sales Exception (< 4%): NO 3. STATUS EXPLANATION No statutory exceptions or exemptions apply. Both companies exceed the jurisdictional size threshold, horizontal competition exists, and competitive sales exceed both the absolute and percentage safe harbors. 4. CONCLUSION & ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATION Based on this analysis, the interlocking directorate is NON-COMPLIANT and prohibited under Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Under Section 8(b), if this is a newly arising conflict, a 1-year statutory grace period applies to cure the interlock. Otherwise, immediate remediation (such as resignation from one board) is required to avoid FTC or DOJ regulatory action.

You can copy this generated memorandum directly into your board packets, governance files, or compliance records.

Advertisement
Bottom Banner Ad (728x90)

Understanding Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act

Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits "interlocking directorates"—the simultaneous service of a person as a director or officer of two competing corporations—subject to specific financial and competitive safe harbor thresholds. The statute is designed to prevent anti-competitive coordination or communication between competitors at the board or executive leadership level.

How FTC Threshold Updates Work (2025 - 2026)

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is statutorily required to adjust the jurisdictional thresholds of Section 8 annually based on changes in the gross national product. In January 2026, the FTC revised the capital and surplus threshold under Section 8(a)(1) to $54,402,000, up from $51,380,000 in 2025. Similarly, the competitive sales absolute exception limit under Section 8(a)(2)(A) was adjusted to $5,440,200, up from $5,138,000 in 2025.

The Three Competitive Sales Safe Harbors

Even if both corporations exceed the primary asset size threshold, the interlock remains entirely lawful if any of the following three competitive exceptions are met:

  • The Absolute De Minimis Exception: The competitive sales of either corporation are less than the statutory dollar limit ($5,440,200 for 2026).
  • The 2% Individual Exception: The competitive sales of either corporation are less than 2.0% of its total consolidated revenues.
  • The 4% Mutual Exception: The competitive sales of each corporation represent less than 4.0% of their respective total consolidated revenues.

The 1-Year Statutory Grace Period under Section 8(b)

Recognizing that corporate sales and asset values change dynamically, the statute includes a safety valve under Section 8(b). If an interlock was previously compliant but becomes non-compliant due to an increase in corporate assets or competitive sales, the individual is allowed a period of one year (12 months) from the date of the change to cure the interlock, typically by resigning from one of the positions or by selling/divesting the competing product lines.

Active Enforcement & Modern Governance Practices

In 2026, Section 8 is a primary focus of federal antitrust regulators, with the FTC and DOJ aggressively auditing interlocking boards within private equity (PE), healthcare, tech, and retail sectors. Modern corporate compliance dictates that boards execute regular D&O (Director and Officer) questionnaires and annual competitive overlap analysis to ensure no prohibited interlocks are active. Furthermore, antitrust authorities increasingly evaluate Section 8 principles for non-corporate entities (such as LLCs and partnerships), making thorough cross-portfolio audits vital.

GustoVerified Payroll Partner
Payroll & S-Corp
3 Months Free + $100 Visa Card

Run IRS-Compliant S-Corp & Small Business Payroll

Automate officer reasonable compensation, federal tax withholdings, and quarterly W-2/941 filings with zero manual paperwork.

Discussion & Comments

Join the conversation, ask questions, or share feedback.

Advertisement